|
|
Post by Look'n4Tuna on Dec 1, 2010 17:43:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by blacktip on Dec 1, 2010 17:47:29 GMT -5
I wonder how it will effect the structural integrity of the west span. Hopefully they make more rubble piles near the west span.
|
|
|
|
Post by Look'n4Tuna on Dec 1, 2010 17:51:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bridgetender on Dec 1, 2010 17:52:27 GMT -5
Not much longer saving up for a boat !!! ; ) |
|
|
|
Post by havetofish on Dec 1, 2010 18:46:25 GMT -5
Sounds like there may at least be some easier access to the East rock piles..which would be nice, since you could at least freeline easier on the incoming tide.
|
|
|
|
Post by BigDawg71 on Dec 1, 2010 19:02:39 GMT -5
Sounds like there may at least be some easier access to the East rock piles..which would be nice, since you could at least freeline easier on the incoming tide. yep, until they close the whole thing down..of course right before they do that they will double the rates again |
|
|
|
Post by goindeep on Dec 1, 2010 23:40:16 GMT -5
Not much longer saving up for a boat !!! ; ) Yuppers...Im about 3 months or so away from buying one myself. |
|
|
|
Post by tylerdurden on Dec 2, 2010 8:08:38 GMT -5
i dont think gags are closed for inshore waters yet
|
|
|
|
Post by dadflyer on Dec 2, 2010 14:45:24 GMT -5
So let me this straight: If they are spending 4 million to take down "parts" of the east span. And the FL DOT says "eventually a decision will be made about the western piers"
Hopefully they will build up the western span with the debris from the eastern span ~ nah !! Or does that make too much sense !
We are losing shoreline access
We are losing private boat launches to condo's
They've already closed the Gandy access due to liability issues
They've already closed the East spans, and trying to figure out how to limit their liability.
We already have some of the debris from already taken out spans and pylons providing the artificial reef fishing.
Perhaps the east spans could be used to slow down the pylon erosion on the west pylons , and extend the life of the current fishing bridge ?
Dadflyer
|
|
|
|
Post by jaeforceone on Dec 2, 2010 22:49:27 GMT -5
Well we got till 2021 for the west span to be closed, and freelining the other side without getting cut off on the east span would be nice. I do hope the demolition does not scare away the fish though. I hope we don't have issues with the divers and work boats while fishing too.
|
|
|
|
Post by SkyJay on Dec 3, 2010 11:05:03 GMT -5
Oh well I stil my memories!
Just got through with a rather long letter to Governor elect Rick Scott
I would encourage every one to do the same
Wasteful government spending at its finest
Why spend money to reiocate concrete when you can drop it where it lays
Guess that would be to easy
Someone please enlighten me on the six month closure on gags
|
|
|
|
Post by lutzfuji on Dec 3, 2010 19:24:52 GMT -5
So they will spend 4 million dollars to destroy the east side , but they say they have no funding to maintain or overall the west side.....does the east side burn money sitting there doing nothing? Why spend money to destroy it when they can invest in the west side. blah
|
|
|
|
Post by havetofish on Dec 3, 2010 20:16:04 GMT -5
Why spend money to destroy it when they can invest in the west side. blah Because they are afraid that some boater will ignore the "Falling Debris" signs and a chunk of concrete will land on his head. |
|
